Legal Opinion

Gail S. Huecker, Cross-Appellees v. Elizabeth Milburn, and Marian Weisenberger, Cross-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 21, 1976No. 75-1471 — 75-1474PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, administrators of the Kentucky welfare program, appeal from the *1243award of attorneys’ fees in two cases from the Western District of Kentucky1 which are consolidated on appeal. In Milburn v. Huecker, 500 F.2d 1279 (6th Cir. 1974), we affirmed the District Courts’ grant of prospective relief and denial of retroactive payment of welfare benefits.2 However, we reversed the Courts’ denial of costs and attorneys’ fees and remanded the cases for reconsideration of those requests and for sufficient findings of fact to permit meaningful appellate review. Id. at…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. John C. Shimman v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  2. International Union of Petroleum and Industrial Workers v. Western Industrial Maintenance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Weisenberger v. HueckerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  5. An-Ti Chai v. Michigan Technological UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API