Legal Opinion

Schmid v. Pastor

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2009No. DA 08-0296PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Scott and Cindy Schmid (‘Schmids”) appeal the order of the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, Montana, granting a prescriptive easement in favor of Joseph, Patti, and Monica Pastor (‘Pastors”), Lynn Thurlow, and Tracy Holst. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

¶2 We consider the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in granting a prescriptive easement to Lot 14 for year-round residential and recreational use?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in granting a prescriptive easement to Lots 15 and 16 for year-round residential and recreational use?

BACKGROUND

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leichtfuss v. DabneyMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Renner v. NemitzMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Kelly v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. MerrickMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Lindley v. MaggertMontana Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown & Brown of MT, Inc. v. RatyMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. McKay v. Wilderness Development, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Public Lands Access Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Lyndes v. GreenMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Cremer Rodeo Land v. McMullenMontana Supreme Court · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API