Legal Opinion

HNATH v. Hereford

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided December 2, 2010No. Case 10-CV-568-GKF-PJCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the Motion to Dismiss of defendant Daphne Hereford [Doc. No. 12] and the Motion to Dismiss Foreclosure of Lien of defendants Hereford and Rin Tin Tin Incorporated (“Rin Tin Tin Inc.”) [Doc. No. 13]. Defendant Hereford contends she should be dismissed from the case pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction. Defendants seek dismissal of Count III of the Petition under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim or alternatively under Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Ridge at Red Hawk, L.L.C. v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Newsome v. GallacherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API