Legal Opinion

Rhoton v. City of Norman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 17, 1970No. 43488PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

This is an original proceeding to review an order of the State Industrial Court sitting en banc affirming a decision of the trial judge denying petitioner, Gus Rhoton, claimant below, workmen’s compensation benefits under the provisions of the Oklahoma Workmen’s Compensation Act. Parties will be referred to as they appeared before the State Industrial Court.

In denying the claim of the claimant the State Industrial Court held:

“That Claimant was employed by Respondent, City of Norman, Oklahoma, on March 15, 1967, in Respondent’s park and recreation department.
“That Claimant was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burger v. LickliterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. McClung v. ColclasureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Cooper v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. BOARD OF EDUCATION, INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST NO. 1, TULSA v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Oklahoma City v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Hissom Memorial Center v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Oklahoma City v. AcostaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  4. Town of Boswell v. TraboldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API