Legal Opinion
CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 27, 2009No. C 04-03268 MHPPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Re: Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for Failure to Claim Patent-Eligible Subject Matter
MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge.
In this patent infringement litigation, plaintiff CyberSource Corporation has asserted claims 2 and 3 of U.S. Patent No. 6,029,154 (“the '154 patent”) against defendant Retail Decisions, Inc. Defendant brings a motion for summary judgment of invalidity, contending that the patent claims are not drawn to patent-eligible subject matter as required by 35 U.S.C. section 101. Having considered the parties’ arguments and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parker v. FlookSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Dealertrack, Inc. v. HuberCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- CLS Bank International v. Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- CMG Financial Services, Inc. v. Pacific Trust Bank, F.S.B.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- DealerTrack, Inc. v. HuberDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.