Legal Opinion

DealerTrack, Inc. v. Huber

District Court, C.D. California

Decided July 7, 2009No. Case CV 06-2335 AG (FMOx)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF '427 PATENT

ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.

Defendants Finance Express, LLC (“Finance Express”) and RouteOne, LLC (“RouteOne”) (collectively, “Defendants”) have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity as to U.S. Patent 7,181,-427 (“Motion”). Because the Court finds that the '427 Patent is directed to unpatentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and the recent case of In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed.Cir.2008), Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff DealerTrack, Inc. (“Dealer-Track”) asserts that Finance…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Colorado v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  5. In Re BilskiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dealertrack, Inc. v. HuberCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  2. CLS Bank International v. Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Accenture Global Services GmbH v. Guidewire Software Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  4. Mortgage Grader, Inc. v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  5. BANCORP SERVICES v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of CanadaDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API