Russo v. APL Marine Services, Ltd.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT APL MARINE SERVICES, LTD.’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [34]
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Valerie Russo (“Russo”) alleges that Defendants APL Marine Services, Ltd. (“APL”) and Captain James Londagin (“Captain Londagin”) violated a myriad of California state and federal laws, including sexual harassment, sexual discrimination, negligence, and unseaworthiness while oh the high seas. Defendants move for partial summary judgment .on the basis that California state law does not apply…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ali Sadiqyar v. Mission Essential, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Anna Livingston v. Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2026
- Brown v. APL Maritime Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Civello v. Equinix IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Elzeftawy v. Pernix Group Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.