Brown v. APL Maritime Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 QUENTIN M. BROWN, et al., Case No. 22-cv-06999-DMR 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS 9 v. TO DISMISS, TO STRIKE, AND FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT 10 APL MARITIME LTD., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 35, 51 11 Defendants. 12 Defendant APL Marine Services Ltd. (“APL”) moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 13 Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss Plaintiff Quentin M. Brown’s first amended complaint (“FAC”).1 14 Defendant Yasin Berber moves to dismiss the FAC’s fifth and sixth claims for intentional and 15 negligent infliction…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.