Legal Opinion
Concrete General, Inc. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 25, 1991No. Civ. A. MJG-88-1356PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GARBIS, District Judge.
The Court has before it the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, as well as memoranda and affidavits filed in connection with their motions. The Court has also had the benefit of oral argument with respect to these motions.
Plaintiff Concrete General, Inc., a Maryland corporation engaged in the business of highway construction, brings this action to challenge the constitutionality of the Minority Procurement Policy (“MPP”), adopted by the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission with regard to procurement contracts. Concrete General contends…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bushek v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- (2006), Maryland Attorney General Reports2006
- Alexander v. Prince George's County, Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1995
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Johnson & Higgins, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Legal Guidance on the Implications of the Supreme Court's Decision in Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1995