Legal Opinion

Legal Guidance on the Implications of the Supreme Court's Decision in Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña

Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel

Decided June 28, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

Legal Guidance on the Implications of the Supreme Court’s Decision in Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peha This memorandum sets forth preliminary legal guidance on the implications of the Supreme C ourt’s decision in Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peha, which held that “ strict scrutiny’’ is the standard that governs judicial review of the constitutionality of federal affirmative action programs that use racial and ethnic criteria as a basis for decisionmaking. The memorandum is not intended to serve as a definitive statement of what Adarand means for any particular affirmative action program;…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API