Legal Opinion

Duckett v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 4, 1986No. WCB 83-06180; A33686Published

1Per curiam

While her case was pending before the Workers’ Compensation Board, claimant petitioned the Board to remand it to the referee for consideration of evidence discovered after the hearing that indicated conclusively, and for the first time, that the cause of her pain and disability was a herniated disc. ORS 656.295(6). The Board denied the petition; it did review the new evidence and concluded that it was relevant to an aggravation claim, which was not an issue then before it. SAIF concedes that remand was probably appropriate, Bailey v. SAIF, 296 Or 41, 622 P2d 333 (1983), but suggests that we…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hennings v. Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API