Legal Opinion

Billips v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided June 6, 2006No. 0172053PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEAN HARRISON CLEMENTS, Judge.

Matthew Edward Billips appeals the sentences imposed by the trial judge following Billips’s conviction in a jury trial of criminal solicitation, in violation of Code § 18.2-29, and two counts of forcible sodomy, in violation of Code § 18.2-67.1. Billips contends the trial judge erred at sentencing in (1) refusing to recuse himself after inappropriately receiving a sentencing verdict from the jury, (2) admitting the sentencing guidelines portion of the presentence report into evidence even though Billips was a juvenile when the offenses were committed, and (3)…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Billips v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  2. Logan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
  3. Sisk v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Rozario v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
  5. Billips v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API