Legal Opinion

Billips v. Com.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 2, 2007No. Record 062180PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY Senior Justice CHARLES S. RUSSELL.

In a case of first impression, this appeal questions the admissibility of opinion evidence based upon plethysmograph testing at a sentencing proceeding.

Facts and Proceedings

Matthew Edward Billips, then a juvenile, was charged with two counts of forcible sodomy of a child under the age of 13 years, and one count of soliciting a child to commit sodomy. The juvenile and domestic relations district court certified the case to the circuit court, where Billips was found guilty of all three offenses in a jury trial. The circuit court continued the case…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Spencer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  4. Clay v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  5. O'Dell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Zektaw v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  2. Adams v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  3. Dowdy v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  4. Turner v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  5. Frederick Anthony Mitchell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API