Legal Opinion

Searles v. Darling

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 7, 1951No. 5, February Session, 1951PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tunnell, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

J. Frank Darling, one of the appellees, proposes to huild an apartment house in Wilmington, and nearby, at 1701 Hancock Street, as an incident to the apartment house enterprise, an eight-story garage. There is no difficulty about the apartment building; this case concerns the garage. The problem arises because the lot where Darling has applied for permission to build his garage is within a district zoned as residential.

Attending first to the sequence of events, the record reveals that after Darling had proposed to construct the apartment house,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Devereux Foundation, Inc., Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Heath v. M. C.C. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. Brackett v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Greenwich Gas Co. v. TuthillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Donovan v. Delaware Water & Air Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
  3. Baker v. ConnellSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  4. Janaman v. New Castle County Board of AdjustmentSuperior Court of Delaware · 1976
  5. Auditorium, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of Mayor & Council of WilmingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API