Legal Opinion

Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Corporate Recoveries Incorporated

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 9, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00728Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, CASE NO. 25-cv-00728-JHC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 CORPORATE RECOVERIES 11 INCORPORATED, 12 Defendant. 13 14 I 15 INTRODUCTION 16 This insurance matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance 17 Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. See Dkt. # 21. Defendant Corporate 18 Recoveries Incorporated (CRI) sued David Hill and Fortune Tukwila, LLC. Hill and Fortune 19 Tukwila brought counterclaims against CRI, arguing that CRI’s actions violated the Washington…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. ArmentaWashington Supreme Court · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API