Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Tierney v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 3, 1981PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

This action arises from the sale of automobiles manufactured by the defendant, Ford Motor Company (Ford), to Maine residents and consumers. Following the Superior Court’s denial of its motion to dismiss, Ford, as an “aggrieved party,” moved the Superior Court pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 72(c) to report the case to the Law Court. 1 The Superior Court granted Ford’s motion to report the case over the Attorney General’s opposition on the grounds that the issues presented were of sufficient doubt and importance to justify report to this Court. We reverse in part the ruling of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Levings v. Forbes & Wallace, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  2. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. United States v. FruehaufSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Harmon v. EmersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Adams v. Buffalo Forge Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Burnham v. Mark IV Homes, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Guiggey v. BombardierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. Suminski v. Maine Appliance Warehouse, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  5. Brousseau v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API