Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
Bon.~B. Carl Rdlder, Secretary~ Texas State Board of Dental Examiners Nixon Buildlng~ Corpus Christi, Texas Dear Sir: OplnLon No. O-2058 Re: (a) Whether or not bperation of chain dental offices under facts set forth Is in violation of the laws of this State. (b) Whether 6r not the dentist in question is violating laws regulat- ing the practice of dentistry. Xe have for reply your letter of March 7, 1940, stippl& mented by y-ourletter of April 2, 1940;reque.+.tlngthe opinion of this department on the above stated questions. The facts underlying your opinion request are restated as follows: The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Sherman v. State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Pistole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912