Legal Opinion
Opinion of the Justices
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 15, 1995No. 346PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1358Members of the House of Representatives
Alabama State House
Montgomery, Alabama 36130
Dear Representatives:
We have received House Resolution No. 176 (“the Resolution”) by which you request the opinion of the Justices as to whether House Bill 586 (sometimes herein called the “Bill”), now pending in the House of Representatives, violates the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, as amended.
We are aware that H.B. 586 was introduced to honor the State’s commitment to Mercedes-Benz, and we applaud the legislature’s willingness to do so. We also applaud Mercedes-Benz for its decision to locate its facility…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Norton v. LuskSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Edmonson v. State Industrial Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Van Hart v. deGRAFFENRIEDSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- City of Birmingham v. City of Vestavia HillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chism v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Natalie Versiglio v. Board of Dental Examiners of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Magee v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
- Eagerton v. Second Econ. Dev. Coop. Dist.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. City of PelhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.