Legal Opinion

Edmonson v. State Industrial Development Authority

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 10, 1966No. 3 Div. 219PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

Appellant, individually and as a taxpayer and a citizen of the State of Alabama, filed this action seeking to have Act No. 662, General Acts of Alabama Regular Session, 1965 declared unconstitutional, and seeking injunctive relief to prevent its operation. The trial court held the act to be constitutional and denied injunctive relief. The Attorney General accepted service and waived further service or notice.

Act No. 662 creates a public corporation known as the State Industrial Authority, composed of the Director of the State Plan ning and Industrial Development Board, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Alabama State Bridge Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. State Ex Rel. Wilkinson v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. In Re Opinions of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Scott v. Alabama State Bridge CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Dobbs v. Shelby County Economic & Industrial Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Knight v. West Alabama Environmental Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  3. Armory Commission of Alabama v. StaudtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Wisconsin Solid Waste Recycling Authority v. EarlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Chism v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API