Legal Opinion

Chalk v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 27, 2009No. 06-35909PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

In this case, we consider whether the district court properly dismissed a consumer class action pursuant to an arbitration agreement between T-Mobile and its customers. We hold that the agreement’s class action waiver is substantively unconscionable and therefore unenforceable under Oregon law. We also note that under the agreement the waiver is not severable. We reverse the district court’s order dismissing the case pending arbitration.

I. Procedural and Factual Background

Plaintiffs-Appellants Paul Stewart and Ellen Chalk bought a GC79 GPRS/Wireless LAN PC card…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Matthew Kilgore v. Keybank, National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Hooper v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  4. Jones v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2009
  5. Pinto v. USAA Insurance Agency Inc. of Texas (FN)District Court, D. Arizona · 2017

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API