Legal Opinion

R.W. v. Sanders

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 11, 2005No. SC 85652PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge.

R.W. filed a petition for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief to prevent enforcement of Missouri’s sex offender registration statutes, section 589.400, et seq. 1 The circuit court denied relief. In this appeal, R.W. argues that the registration statute does not apply to offenders who receive a suspended imposition of sentence, conflicts with the section 610.105 requirement that records pertaining to a suspended imposition of sentence case shall be closed, and constitutes an invalid ex post facto law. The judgment is affirmed.

BACKGROUND

All fifty states, the…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Doe v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. State v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  3. Sidney Lamour Tyson v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Roe v. ReplogleSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  5. Missouri Real Estate Commission v. RayfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API