Legal Opinion
Sidney Lamour Tyson v. State of Indiana
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 2016No. 45S03-1509-CR-528PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MASSA, Justice.
Sidney Lamour Tyson is charged with failing to register as a sex offender in Indiana, the basis of that requirement being his obligation to register in Texas because of a delinquency adjudication. Tyson has moved to dismiss that charge, arguing he does not fit our statutory definition of a sex offender under Indiana Code section 11 — 8—8—5(b), and alternatively, his duty to register upon moving to Indiana violates our Ex Post Facto Clause as applied to him since the definition was amended after he committed the underlying offense. Because Tyson is required to register in…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Andy Mohr West d/b/a Andy Mohr Toyota, Butler Motors, Inc. d/b/a Butler Toyota, and TW Toy, Inc. d/b/a Tom Wood Toyota v. Office of the Ind. Secretary of State, Auto Dealer Services Div.Indiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Shaw v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Brian Hope v. Commissioner of Indiana DepartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Kevin Allyn Ammons v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Janet L. Himsel, Martin Richard Himsel, Robert J. Lannon, Susan M. Lannon v. Samuel Himsel, Cory M. Himsel, Clinton S. Himsel, 4/9 Livestock, LLC, and Co-Alliance, LLP and State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.