Mt. Hood Stages, Inc., Doing Business as Pacific Trailways v. The Greyhound Corporation and Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
This antitrust case is before us for the third time. On the first appeal we affirmed a judgment for plaintiff on the merits, and held the suit not barred by limitations because the running of the statutory period had been tolled under 15 U.S.C. § 16(i). 555 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1977). On certiorari the Supreme Court held section 16(i) inapplicable, but remanded for consideration of whether the running of limitations had been tolled under equitable principles. 437 U.S. 322, 337 n. 21, 98 S.Ct. 2870, 2379 n. 21, 57 L.Ed.2d 239 (1978). We in turn remanded to the district…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Edward Spannaus v. U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Grimmett v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Kwai Wong v. David BeebeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.