Legal Opinion

Oien v. City of Sioux Falls

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1986No. 14763PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

This appeal arises from a personal injury action initiated by plaintiff Kay Oien (Oien), as Guardian Ad Litem for her four-year-old child, Casie Oien (Casie), against the defendant City of Sioux Falls (City). City filed a motion for summary judgment on grounds that SDCL 9-38-55 and SDCL 9-38-105 immunized it from liability under the facts of this case. The trial court found that SDCL 9-38-551 and SDCL 9-*28838-1052 afforded City municipal immunity and granted City’s motion for summary judgment. Oien appeals and we reverse and remand.

City employees chemically treated the water in a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mattson v. AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Riddoch v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. High-Grade Oil Co., Inc. v. SommerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Conway v. HumbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. South Dakota Automobile Club, Inc. v. VolkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Randall v. Fairmont City Police DepartmentWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Kyllo v. PanzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Meinders v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Green v. Siegel, Barnett & SchutzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API