Lechuga v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Rubén Castillo, Chief Judge
Presently before the Court is Petitioner Lionel Lechuga’s pro se petition to vacate his conviction and set aside his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the reasons set forth below, the Court orders an evidentiary hearing on the factual bases of Petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim.
RELEVANT FACTS
The relevant facts relating to Petitioner’s criminal conviction are set forth in a published opinion by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, see United States v. Morales, 655 F.3d 608 (7th Cir.2011), and are repeated here…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clay v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Greenberg v. Amazon.com IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- Nissenbaum v. EddyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- United States v. ClayDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- United States v. WheelerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020