Legal Opinion

Sauer v. Xerox Corp.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided August 8, 1996No. 6:95-cv-06485PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, Chief Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The present controversy arises from a dispute regarding the rights and obligations of parties to two equipment lease agreements. Plaintiff Fred Sauer’s original complaint was filed on September 5, 1995, in the Central District of California. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. On September 18, 1995, defendant Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) successfully transferred the action to this Court.

On November 13, 1995, Sauer filed an amended complaint setting forth thirteen causes of action based on breach of contract, conversion, fraud…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. In Re Time Warner Inc. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ironforge. Com v. Paychex, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2010
  2. Fendi Adele S.R.L. v. Filene's Basement, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. Sauer v. Xerox Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2000
  4. Healey (nee) Palmer v. Mary Jane M. Elliot, P.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API