Legal Opinion
DCMS-ISA, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 14, 2008No. 08-456CPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION1
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court in this bid protest action are the parties’ cross-motions for judgment upon the administrative record pursuant to Rule 52.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) and the motion by the plaintiffs, DCMS-ISA, Inc. (“DCMS-ISA”), L & R Security Forces, Inc. (“L & R”) (also known as Integrated Security Forces, Inc. (“ISF”)), the Whitestone Group, Inc. (“White stone”), and R & D Training and Technical Services (“RDTTS”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”), for an order directing the defendant, the United States…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Galen Medical Associates, Inc. v. United States, and Deborah Downing Md, PllcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- MORI Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Madison Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Defense Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- FFTF Restoration Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Coastal International Security, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.