Visteon Systems v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge McCLOSKEY.
Visteon Systems (Employer) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), affirming an order of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ), denying Employer’s petition to terminate the compensation benefits of Beverly Steglik (Claimant). We now affirm.
Employer employed Claimant as an assembler for approximately twenty-two years. Claimant’s job duties consisted of inspecting circuit boards, placing them in a main board and soldering the boards. Claimant’s job duties required her to perform daily repetitive activities, including…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Beissel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Koszowski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commercial Credit Claims v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Lancaster)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Esab Welding & Cutting Products v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Sexton v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- R. Argro v. WCAB (Ardmore Automotive, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- R. Coleman v. WCAB (Reinhart Food Service)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Sexton v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.