Legal Opinion

Hood v. Hallman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 13, 1977No. 54222PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

Hood, as executrix for the estate of Essie Johnson, appeals the judgment of the trial court sitting without a jury. She enumerates as error the trial court’s finding the contract involved to be a valid and binding one, the court’s admission of certain testimony, and its calculation of damages. The trial court committed no error, and we affirm.

Hallman sued Hood and Neeson, co-executors of Essie Johnson’s estate, for breach of contract. The facts show that Hood and Neeson, pursuant to the authority granted them in Johnson’s will, contracted with Hallman to sell him part of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. King v. BriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Kingston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Quigley v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Burgess v. AritaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. A. R. Hudson Realty, Inc. v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Quigley v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Derrickson v. KristalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API