King v. Brice
Supreme Court of Georgia
Certified questions; from Court of Appeals (Cases 5884, 5885).
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.
The Court of Appeals certifies the following question to the Supreme Court: “Is the description of the property mentioned in the following contract for the sale of real estate sufficiently full and definite to form the basis of a suit for the recovery of damages for breach of said contract? The contract is as follows:
‘$100.00. . Atlanta, Ga., July 2, 1913.
‘Keceived of E. D. & C. S. King one hundred 00/000 dollars as part purchase-money on the following described property: 26 Ponce de Leon Ave. 70 x 185 & 15 foot alley included, which, on and for account of the owner and vendor, we have this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crawford v. VernerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Cowdery v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Singleton v. CloseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Pearson v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Harriss v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Blumberg v. NathanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Quigley v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Boney v. CheshireSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Tolbert v. ShortSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Stanaland v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.