Legal Opinion
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kaplan
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 2, 1975No. 75 C 931PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BRAMWELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the application of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission” or “SEC”) for an order pursuant to Section 22(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77v(b), and Section 21(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78u(c), directing Dr. Manuel Kaplan to appear and to testify pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum and to produce various documents called for pursuant to the said administrative subpoena.
I
In the instant case, the Commission seeks enforcement by this Court of an administrative…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- United States v. Clark J. Matthews IICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Wellman v. DickinsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- In Re Subpoena of Roger Gimbel by Fdic as Receiver for First New York Bank for Business. Roger Gimbel v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Federal Trade Commission v. RockefellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.