Carlisle Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DiCARLO, Judge:
Plaintiffs, representing domestic producers of tire tubes, brought this action challenging the final negative dumping determination in Tubes For Tires, Other Than Bicycle Tires, From the Republic of Korea, 49 Fed.Reg. 26,780 (1984). The action was remanded to the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (Commerce) for recalculations in view of the Court’s finding that merchandise adjustments under 19 U.S.C. § 1677b(a)(4) (1982) and drawback adjustments under 19 U.S.C. § 1677a(d)(l)(B) (1982) were made on the basis of inconsistent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carlisle Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- Brother Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
- Carlisle Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
3Cited by13 opinions
- Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Allied Tube and Conduit Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Far East MacHinery Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Far East MacHinery Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.