Kirk Vester v. Daniel Hallock
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.
Kirk D. Vester appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment as to his excessive-force claim against Deputy Sheriff Daniel Hallock. Vester argues that Hallock’s use of an “arm bar technique” was objectively unreasonable and that he is therefore not entitled to qualified immunity. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
On May 30, 2013, Hallock was dispatched to the 101 Bar & Grill in Hadar, Nebraska, in response to a report that a man had threatened to stab several patrons with a knife. The dispatcher advised Hallock that the suspect had been…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Plumhoff v. RickardSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Ashcroft v. al-KiddSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- City and County of San Francisco v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Troy Rokusek v. Cody JansenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Nagel v. City of JamestownUnited States District Court · 2018
- Bruce v. ColeDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019
- Burns v. Cole THIS IS CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE 6:18-cv-03246-SRB. ALL PLEADINGS ARE TO BE FILED IN THIS CASE.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2018
- Buyalova v. CantrellDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2025
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.