Legal Opinion
Bush v. Clark Construction & Concrete Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 5, 2003No. CIV.A. 02-2140PLFPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, acting pro se, filed this suit against defendants the Clark Construction Group, Inc. (“Clark”) and Michael Hamm, alleging that Clark failed to pay him wages owed under the terms of a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) between Clark and the Laborers’ District Council for Washington, D.C. and Vicinity (the “Union”). See Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss (“Def.Mem.”), Ex. 1, Statement of Claim (“Complaint”). Defendants move to dismiss on the ground that plaintiffs claim is preempted by Section 301…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Williams v. SpencerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers v. Insurance Co. of the WestDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Carson v. SimDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Montgomery v. Omnisec International Security Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Bratton v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.