Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Potts

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 28, 1929No. 8 Div. 28PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The assignments of error are considered in the order urged. The suit was by the father for the death of his infant child. Alabama Power Co. v. Stogner, 208 Ala. 666, 95 So. 151. The proper pleadings in such ease and the question of proximate cause have often been considered by this court, and should not be unnecessarily repeated. There was no error in giving defendant’s charge 1. Morgan Hill Paving Co. v. Fonville (Ala. Sup.) 119 So. 610; Armstrong v. Montgomery Street Ry. Co., 123 Ala. 233, 26 So. 349; Peck v. Henderson (Ala. Sup.) 118 So. 262 ; Western Ry. v. Mutch, 97 Ala. 194, 11 So. 894,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Armstrong v. Montgomery Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Birmingham Ry. Light & Power Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. Western Railway of Alabama v. MutchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  5. Morgan Hill Paving Co. v. FonvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smarr v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  3. City of Dothan v. HardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Arnold J. Uhl v. Echols Transfer Company and Rufus Johnson, I. H. Eskridge v. Echols Transfer Company and Rufus JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API