Legal Opinion

State v. Periman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1977No. 7612SC356PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

In his first assignment of error defendant contends that it was error to allow two of the doctors’ testimony concerning “their respective diagnosis of and understanding of ‘the battered child syndrome.’ ”

Dr. Beddow had just testified as to his findings as a result of the autopsy. The following then took place:

“From my examination of the bruises on the body itself, I have an opinion that, as related to the time of death of the patient, the bruises occurred at varying stages in time prior to death. We can determine this by the coloration which there is characteristic changes that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. State v. LossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. State v. CauleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. State v. FredellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. SallieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. MappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. HoughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API