Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Campbell

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1923No. Crim. No. 736PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

Petitioners, claiming that they are illegally restrained of their liberty by the sheriff of Humboldt County, ask this court for an order discharging them from such restraint through the writ of habeas corpus.

The return of the sheriff discloses that his authority for holding and restraining the petitioners is derived from an order, made by the police judge in and for the city oif Eureka, Humboldt County, committing the petitioners to his custody pending their trial for the alleged violation of the provisions of section 4 of Ordinance No. 813 of said city, or until a bail bond in the sum of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SteelikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. People v. La RueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. People v. WismerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. People v. RoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Mello v. BurchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. State v. KassayOhio Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API