Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Kassay

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1932No. 22990Published

1Dissent

I concur in the dissenting opinion of Judge KINKADE, and desire to add some further observations upon a case of so much moment to the liberties of the entire people, not only in Ohio, but throughout the United States.

Since criminal syndicalism, as defined in Sections 13421-23 and 13421-24, General Code, applies to the expression of opinion in favor of certain acts "as a means of accomplishing industrial or political reform," we have in this statute a direct attempt to deny the right to express opinion upon social and political questions.

The indictment is brought under that clause of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Abrams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Fiske v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API