Nieto v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Justice.
A jury found Felipe Nieto, Jr. guilty of burglary of a habitation with intent to commit theft. The trial court found Nieto to be a repeat offender and assessed punishment at thirty years confinement. Nieto appeals by a single point of error, complaining that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for an instructed verdict of acquittal because the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to identify him as the person who burglarized the complainant’s house.
The complainant, William Solelether, testified that he lived by himself in a rural residence just…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Kuykendall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Phelps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Grice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Bowen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Villarreal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Rios v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Epps v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Mathew v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
- Guerrero v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.