Legal Opinion

Nieto v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided March 16, 1989No. 13-88-011-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Justice.

A jury found Felipe Nieto, Jr. guilty of burglary of a habitation with intent to commit theft. The trial court found Nieto to be a repeat offender and assessed punishment at thirty years confinement. Nieto appeals by a single point of error, complaining that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for an instructed verdict of acquittal because the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to identify him as the person who burglarized the complainant’s house.

The complainant, William Solelether, testified that he lived by himself in a rural residence just…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Kuykendall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Phelps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Grice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Bowen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Villarreal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  2. Rios v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  3. Epps v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  4. Mathew v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
  5. Guerrero v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API