Villarreal v. State

OPINION

HINOJOSA, Justice.

A jury found appellant, Celestino Villarreal, guilty of the offense of burglary of a habitation with intent to commit theft. 1 After he pleaded true to an allegation in the indictment that he was a repeat felony offender, the trial court assessed appellant’s punishment at twenty-five years imprisonment. By four points of error, appellant contends: (1) the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to sustain his conviction; (2) the trial court erred in overruling his objection to the prosecutor’s comment that he failed to testify; and (3) the trial court erred in…