Legal Opinion

Storm v. Richart (Waggoner, Interveners)

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 21, 1915No. 7282PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Creek County; Wade S. Stanfield, Judge. Action by Fred E. Storm against W. T. Richart. S. O. Waggoner and another intervened. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

Plaintiff’s petition was filed August 16, 1912, and trial had November 15th following. Judgment being rendered in favor of defendant, plaintiff on the same day filed a motion for a new trial (although the motion does not appear in the case-made). The motion for a new trial does not appear to have been acted upon until June 5, 1914, when it was overruled. September 23d following an order of the court was entered, modifying the judgment of June 5th in certain particulars. The petition in error, with case-made attached, was .filed in this court March 26, 1915, or more than six months after the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crow v. CrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. School Dist. No. 38 v. MacKey, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Malloy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Caswell v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. St. Louis. S. F. R. Co. v. TaliaferroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Perry v. WerlineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Voorhies v. BissellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API