School Dist. No. 38 v. MacKey, County Treasurer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Hughes County; Mandamus by School District No. 38, Hughes county, state of Oklahoma, on the relation of F.- M. Hale, director of the school board for said district, against B. W. Mackey, county treasurer. Judgment for defendant, and' plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SBIARP, C.
On January 30, 1911, plaintiff instituted an action in the district court of Hughes county, seeking a pvrit of mandamus to compel the defendant, B. W. Mackey,' treasurer of Blughes county, Okla., to pay a certain warrant in the sum of $479.41, drawn upon the treasurer of Hughes county, in favor of School District No. 38 of Hughes county. On March 4th thereafter, defendant filed his answer, to,which a demurrer was filed June 29, 1911, and on the same day an agreed statement of facts was filed with the clerk of the court. On August 7, 1911, the case came on to be heard upon…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners of Garfield v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Stanard v. Sampson Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Moore v. Howard Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Malloy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Sumner v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Howard v. ArkansawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Garland v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Durant v. NesbitSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Barnett v. TaborSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Dunlap v. C. T. Herring Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.