Legal Opinion

Bernard v. Rideout

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 4, 2024No. 1:23-cv-02235Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * EDWARD BERNARD, * * Plaintiff * * Civ. No.: MJM-23-2235 v. * * JACOB RIDEOUT, * * Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on Jacob Rideout’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment and Edward Bernard’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Strike. Both Motions are fully briefed and ripe for disposition. No hearing is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md. 2023). For the reasons set forth below, the Court shall deny Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike and grant…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API