Creager v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
WOMACK, Judge.
We granted discretionary review of this case to decide if the court of appeals had correctly analyzed the appellant’s claim that his written statement was involuntary.
The appellant was interrogated by the 271st Judicial District Attorney’s investigator, who obtained an arrest warrant from a magistrate in Jack County and went to Hobbs, New Mexico, where the appellant was working. After the appellant was arrested, the investigator interrogated him in the Hobbs Police Department’s jail. The interrogation was tape-recorded, and the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by320 opinions
- Nenno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Harner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
- Frank v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
315 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.