Legal Opinion

Wholesale Grocers Corp. v. Richheimer Brokerage Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 30, 1924No. Gen. No. 28,313PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Plaintiff brought an action of replevin against the defendant seeking to recover 268 cases of salmon of the value of $2,144. None of the goods being taken on the writ, the action was changed to trover. After-wards, plaintiff sued out an attachment in aid and the City State Bank of Chicago was served as garnishee. It filed its answer to interrogatories admitting an indebtedness to the defendant of $77.22.

At the beginning of the trial, which was had before the court without a jury, counsel for the defendant moved that the attachment be quashed on the ground that an attachment in aid would not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cloyes v. PlaatjeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  2. Brewster v. Van LiewIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Johnson v. Canfield-Swigart Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Robinson v. AlexanderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  5. Meyer v. MeyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Vaughan's Seed StoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  2. Byalos v. MathesonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  3. Fishel v. F.M. Ball Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Roth v. FleckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  5. Sunbeam Beverage Co. v. CunninghamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API