Legal Opinion

Johnson v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 27, 2007No. 01-428TPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIRESTONE, Judge.

This case comes before the court on a motion by the defendant, the United States (“government” or “defendant”), for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). The plaintiffs, Aben E. Johnson and Joan G. Johnson (“Johnsons” or “plaintiffs”), were victims of a fraudulent gem scheme in which they lost nearly $78,000,000.00 to John Robert Hasson during the 1990s.1 In 2000, Mr. Hasson was convicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida of conspiracy to commit crimes against the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Colorcon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API