Legal Opinion
Johnson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 9, 2008No. Nos. 01-428T, 03-2803T, 05-1265TPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
This ease comes before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. This is the third motion for summary judgment the court has considered in these consolidated cases, which were filed by the plaintiffs, Aben E. Johnson (“Mr. Johnson”) and Joan G. Johnson (collectively, “plaintiffs” or “John-sons”), in an effort to recover taxes they incurred in relation to losses they suffered as the victims of fraud. In July 2006, the government filed a motion for partial summary judgment in Case No. 03-2803, contending that, as a matter of law, the plaintiffs were not entitled…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Pelagic Fishing Company, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Becky Lynn Massey v. Del Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robert F. Goeller and Jeanette M. Goeller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Adkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Adkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016