Legal Opinion

Kuchel v. First Trust & Savings Bank of Pasadena

California Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1947No. L. A. No. 19801PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

The State Controller has appealed from an order of the probate court of Los Angeles County exempting “the residue of [this] estate” from the payment of an inheritance tax. Appellant challenges the propriety of this exemption under section 6, subdivision (1) (b), of the Inheritance Tax Act of California (Stats. 1935, p. 1266; 3 Leering’s Gen. Laws, Act 8495), but the determinative factors of record herein do not sustain his position.

The case is submitted upon an “agreed statement on appeal.”

John D. Barter died testate on October 15, 1941, a resident of Los Angeles County. The residuary clause…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Estate of RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Kennedy v. McDougalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Crocker v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Estate of WatkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Kirkwood v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Estate of BarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Estate of AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Estate of FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Estate of VaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API