Legal Opinion

Estate of Watkinson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1923No. S. F. No. 9937PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A rehearing was granted in this matter in order that the appellants and the several amici curiae might give the court the benefit of oral argument upon the points urged in their respective petitions for rehearing. Upon such argument and submission of the cause the court adheres to its former conclusions as expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Richards, pro tern., which opinion, with the insertion of certain more recently cited authorities, reads as follows:

“This appeal is from an order of the superior court confirming the report of the inheritance tax appraiser with relation to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. New York Trust Co. v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Chanler v. KelseySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Kennedy v. McDougalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Stebbins v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Kizer v. HannaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Estate of RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Estate of RadovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Estate of ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API