Katcher v. Home Savings & Loan Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtJefferson, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint upon the granting of defendant’s motion for a summary judgment.
These background facts are undisputed. Plaintiffs are four married couples who own homes situated along Mulholland Drive as it winds along the edge of and near the crest of the Santa Monica Mountains above Laurel Canyon and overlooking the San Fernando Valley. When plaintiffs built or became the owners of these residences they had few neighbors. The San Fernando Valley was then largely undeveloped. The site of plaintiffs’ homes commanded a breathtaking, totally…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Snider v. SniderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Saporta v. BarbagelataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Kramer v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Burke v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Posey v. LeavittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Lombardy v. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Hill v. San Jose Family Housing Partners, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.